PARIS – FIFA President Gianni Infantino has proposed an independent review of the world soccer body’s decision-making, in a move that could help him regain support after the withdrawal of a controversial private investment plan.
“First, I will ask the Council whether it wishes to commission an independent external review of FIFA’s current governance framework for major strategic initiatives and recommend potential improvements,” Infantino wrote to the FIFA Council and all 211 member association presidents in a letter seen by Reuters.
He also said he would propose consultations with confederations, member associations and other stakeholders on strengthening FIFA’s decision-making.
The proposals would examine who has a say in major initiatives, including the respective roles of the president, Bureau, Council and Congress, and how to improve transparency and accountability.
Infantino faced a fierce backlash over his proposal to sell a 20 per cent stake in FIFA’s commercial rights, including the World Cup, to private investors.
The plan was abandoned in July after opposition and boycott threats, with UEFA, the Asian Football Confederation and CONCACAF subsequently calling for changes to FIFA’s leadership.
His opponents have been struggling to find a candidate to challenge Infantino, who will be running for re-election in March in Rabat.
Sources familiar with the discussions told Reuters this month that he still had enough votes to win, prompting opponents to focus on curbing his powers.
Infantino said the abandoned plan had explored whether selling a minority stake in a FIFA-controlled commercial company could raise more money for football development.
It would not have involved giving up control over sporting decisions, he said.
But the proposal became public before it could be presented in full to the Council and member associations, according to Infantino.
“I recognise that, without the full context, this caused concern and created the impression that decisions had already been taken. They had not,” he wrote in the letter sent on Monday.
“It remained a proposal, not a decision, and was always subject to the necessary approvals of the Council and the Member Associations. It has now been withdrawn and will not proceed.”
