Abdelmonem Fawzi
We no longer just use the internet, but the internet uses us. Every swipe, pause, like, and angry comment is harvested, analysed, and sold.
In the attention economy, human focus is the planet’s most valuable raw material, and a handful of corporations have turned it into one of the largest industries on Earth.
The numbers are staggering. In 2022, the global digital advertising market, the fuel of the attention economy, was worth $567 billion.
By 2025, it is projected to top $700 billion, with social media alone accounting for more than a third of that sum.
Just two companies, Alphabet (Google and YouTube) and Meta (Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp), pocketed $341 billion in advertising revenue in 2022, more than half the entire world’s digital ad spend.
TikTok, Netflix, Snapchat, and the rest fight over the scraps. This is not an accident of technology, but the core business model. Free apps and services are not free. You pay with something far more precious than money: minutes of your life and the data those minutes generate.
As Nobel laureate Herbert Simon warned half a century ago, “a wealth of information creates a poverty of attention”.
In an age of infinite content, attention has become the ultimate bottleneck, and the tech giants built their empires by controlling it.
Artificial intelligence is their weapon of choice. Behind every endlessly scrolling feed lies an algorithm that does not see you as a person with dreams, fears, and limited time. It sees you as a constantly updating document: a string of clicks, dwell times, heart-rate changes inferred from scrolling speed, and emotional reactions measured by how quickly you tap an angry-face emoji.
The more precisely the algorithm predicts what will keep you hooked, the more ads it can serve, and the higher your lifetime value to the platform becomes.
The result is a world engineered for distraction. Notifications are timed to interrupt you at moments of boredom or mild anxiety.
Outrage travels faster than nuance because outrage keeps eyes glued. A 15-second clip of a shouting politician generates more watch-time, and therefore more revenue, than a 10-minute explanation of policy.
Reason is simply bad for business. Most of us feel the toll. Screen-time reports arrive like monthly guilt trips. We know the hours we lose, the sleep we sacrifice, the relationships that suffer when dinner-table conversation competes with glowing rectangles.
We hate how shallow and reactive we have become, yet the same platforms that make us feel terrible are expertly designed to become our favourite coping mechanism.
Feeling bad about your digital addiction? Post a selfie. The rush of likes will dull the shame for a few minutes. Tristan Harris, the former Google design ethicist turned whistle-blower, calls this “the largest, most coordinated hijacking of human attention in history”.
And the hijacking is only accelerating. In many parts of the world, the damage is especially acute. Across Africa, where smartphone penetration has exploded and hundreds of millions of young people are coming online for the first time, the attention economy arrives without guardrails. Cheap data bundles and zero-rated platforms pull users into the same addictive loops that took wealthier societies a decade to recognize as harmful.
Studies already show rising anxiety, depression, and attention disorders among African youth who spend hours chasing trends, comparing lives, and doom-scrolling through conflict and outrage imported from algorithms that do not care about local context.
Apple’s Screen Time feature and similar tools are marketed as solutions, but they are little more than conscience-soothing theater: the casino handing out a pamphlet on responsible gambling while still piping oxygen to the slot machines.
Real change will not come from features that gently scold us. It will come from regulation that forces platforms to compete on human well-being instead of pure engagement, from funding large-scale digital-literacy programmes, and from designing alternative networks that treat people as citizens rather than as extractable resources.
Until then, we remain what the algorithms have quietly made us: living, breathing, ever-updating documents whose every thought and emotion is raw material for someone else’s profit.
The attention economy is not a side effect of the digital age. It is the business model of our age, and unless we rewrite the contract, our minds will never truly be our own again.
